Mark Dean Projects Stations of the Cross Videos On Henry Moore Altar




Over the Easter period, St Stephen Walbrook, was involved in Stations 2017, a two-part artwork based on the Stations of the Cross and the Stations of the Resurrection. The first part of this project involved the artist Mark Dean in projecting filmed Stations of the Cross onto the central, circular Henry Moore altar at St Stephen Walbrook throughout the night on Easter Eve.

Mark Dean’s videos are not literal depictions of the Stations of the Cross, the journey Jesus walked on the day of his crucifixion

Mark Dean’s videos are not literal depictions of the Stations of the Cross, the journey Jesus walked on the day of his crucifixion. Instead, Dean appropriated a few frames of iconic film footage together with extracts of popular music and then slowed down, reversed, looped or otherwise altered these so that the images he selected were amplified through their repetition. As an example, in the first Stations of the Cross video, a clip of Julie Andrews as the novice Maria from the opening scenes of The Sound of Music was layered over an extract, from the Alfred Hitchcock film Psycho, of a car arriving at Bates Motel where Marion Crane would be murdered by Norman Bates. The blue of the sky and the innocence suggested by Maria’s religious vocation was in contrast with the footage from Psycho, which was indicative of the violent death to which Jesus was condemned. In this way Dean brought images from outside church into church and made them central to the Easter Vigil by projecting them onto an altar which had been designed for people to gather as a community around the place where God can be found; the Eucharist, the central act of Christian worship, the re-enactment of Christ’s sacrifice.

In St Paul’s Cathedral for the second part of the project, the staging was inverted as the dancers performed in the central space under the dome, whilst Dean’s video was played on television monitors placed around the edge of this circular space. The monitors appeared almost like a clock face marking out the boundaries of human experience. Five dancers emerged from the shadows around the edge of the stage and started to navigate the space, sometimes individually and sometimes in groups, to form tableaux which were visually reminiscent of the acts of protecting, comforting and carrying each other. The dancers regularly perforated the boundary, moving out beyond the stage and the audience, before returning to the centre and reconnecting in different configurations. As a result, the on-lookers found themselves within the action of these movements.

As an artist-priest, Mark Dean inhabits the twin worlds of art and religion. These are often viewed as disconnected but have intersected in modernism more frequently and with greater interest and insight than is frequently acknowledged by art critics and historians alike. I asked Mark to explore some of these intersections as they relate to Stations2017.

What was the genesis of this project?

I’ve been looking for a way to make work for churches since I returned to making art in the early 90’s, which coincided with my getting confirmed as a Christian. In 1997 I made Scorpio Rising 2 (The Gospel According to St Matthew / Hells Angels on Wheels) which ten years later was installed in Berwick Parish Church as part of a film festival (and is available online at tailbiter.com/scorpiorising2 ) but otherwise I have been quite sceptical of contemporary art in churches, to be honest. I’m not interested in the idea of churches treated like funky gallery spaces, nor in the idea of art as a kind of cultural loss leader to get people into cathedrals etc. But it’s easy to be critical, and less easy to do something about that critique. I did have ideas for works designed for churches – for example, Stations of the Resurrection – but it wasn’t until I started working with other people, especially curator Lucy Newman Cleeve, that I was able to move forward in practice. It was Lucy who introduced me to choreographer Lizzi Kew Ross, and between us, we came up with the idea of an all-night art and dance collaboration for Easter Eve.

This project began with an agreement for Stations of the Resurrection at St Paul’s Cathedral. The idea of and opportunity for showing the Stations of the Cross at St Stephen Walbrook came later. What do you think has added to the project?

Actually, the original proposal was for a combined Stations of the Cross / Stations of the Resurrection in the crypt of St Paul’s, with people then coming up into the main body of the Cathedral for the Easter Eucharist. The Cathedral Chapter liked the idea but couldn’t accommodate us until the second week of Easter, by which time the Stations of the Cross would be past their sell-by for the year. So we agreed we would just do the Stations of the Resurrection in St Paul’s, and then St Stephen Walbrook kindly offered to take the Stations of the Cross. This meant that I could develop the idea of the Stations of the Cross as a liturgy, Lizzi could expand her choreographic ideas under the dome of St Pauls, and Lucy could draw out correspondences between the two churches in her writing about the project.

In what ways have you taken the environment and aesthetics of the churches involved into account in planning this project?

The video installation has been designed to reflect the circular space under the dome of St Paul’s, and the choreography has been devised in tandem with this, including the colours of the cathedral as used by the costume designer. The circular theme has also been developed by the graphic designer, and as already mentioned, by Lucy Newman Cleeve in her catalogue text. A very significant aspect was the decision to use the Henry Moore altar in St Stephen Walbrook as the projection screen for the Stations of the Cross. It didn’t occur to me to do so at first, perhaps due to my aversion to art that obscures or interferes with the function of a church. But once I saw that my work could potentially function as a kind of offering on the altar, then it became the obvious setting.

Some of the films included as Stations were made before the Stations series was conceived and have been exhibited in galleries rather than churches. What effect does showing these works in churches have on the works themselves and what effect do the works have in the churches in which they are being shown? Would these films and performances have the same impact if they were in a gallery setting rather than in churches?

Three of the works have been shown previously in galleries, but each of them was in exhibitions that were either explicitly concerned with the question of art and religion or were accompanied by talks on that basis. As already discussed, it is easy to show art in churches in which the context of the church is ignored except on some kind of surface level. But by the same token, it is possible to curate art in galleries that take the question of religion seriously – with some of Lucy’s shows being a particularly good example of this. So I don’t think it is necessarily the church setting per se that is the determining factor. Having said this, if the art in the church setting is seeking to engage with the liturgical function of the church, then it becomes a different matter. That is what we were trying to do with Stations of the Cross, as a vigil, that also worked as an art and dance event.

Some texts used in the Vigil at St Stephen Walbrook related to the narrative of the Stations, others were meditations on the holy or sacred in art. What did these meditations bring to the project?

First and foremost, readings are a traditional element in the liturgy of the vigil, and so all the texts had to function in this context. However, as you have noted, not all the texts were traditional in themselves. In fact, even the passages taken from scripture were not always directly related to the events of the Stations. However, many of the Stations do not have scriptural accounts. There were also readings from non-scriptural sources, many relating to contemporary artists including Gina Pane, Yves Klein and Andy Warhol, all of whom were Christians, and who made work related to their faith, even though they are not generally considered to be religious artists. As important as the readings themselves, was who read them – I asked people to read only a few minutes beforehand, so it was quite spontaneous, and also reflected the diversity of those present.

To what extent is this project exploring the intersections between art and the sacred? Is this project exploring the Stations or exploring the sense of the sacred in art?

That is a good question, but I don’t think I can really answer it in those terms. At the moment I am working as an artist, and a priest, and making art, and ministering. Within that, of course, I am exploring the questions you raise, but at this stage, I am happy to leave it to the work (art and ministry) to provide any answers.

The Stations are the base materials for this project prepared prior to the project and performance while the dance elements are evolving within the life of the project. How do they relate to each other?

That is probably more a question for Lizzi, the choreographer, but I can say that I have been greatly inspired by working with her and her company. Lizzi’s collaborative approach is based on working with the personalities of the dancers, but I notice this does not compromise her vision for the work. I also collaborate in a sense, by working with the existing cultural material, but it is a more mediated engagement.

The films don’t illustrate the Stations and the dance doesn’t illustrate the films. What would you say are the various relationships between the different aspects of the project? What enables it all to hold together?

Lucy Newman Cleeve has written very thoughtfully about this question in the catalogue essay and has framed it partly within the architectural relationship of the two Wren churches. For me, this echoes the relationship between the elements of my work, which often come together (eventually!) in quite surprising ways. It does sometimes feel like it’s not just up to me – that there is an underlying relationship that I am drawing out, or noticing. And so the collaborative basis of this project feels like an extension of that process. And this is confirmed by the fact that all three of us (and of course the churches we are partnering with) have a common relation in our Christian faith, despite our quite different approaches. So without making grand claims, I would say it is the Holy Spirit that binds it all together. Actually, this goes back to the previous question about the sense of the sacred in art. The late critic Stuart Morgan once said to me that the problem with the Modernist engagement with spirituality wasn’t that it wasn’t real, but that it was somehow exclusive – as though only artists were privy to the spirituality that generated creativity. Understanding the working of the Holy Spirit throughout the world helps us to avoid that kind of elitism, which can be understood as a form of Gnosticism.

Words: Revd Jonathan Evens Priest-in-charge St Stephen Walbrook Photo: Courtesy Mark Dean St Stephen Walbrook

Website 

 



Related Posts

Sean Scully: Facing East - 03.11 - 10.12.2017
Suzi Morris: The Viral Sublime - 28 November-16 December 2017, Herrick Gallery
London Art Fair: Celebrating 30 years - 17-21 January 2017 - Book Now
Open Source Salon with Hauser and Wirth - A new monthly discussion group
Advertise your next show on Artlyst from £200 per week